New Canada Minister of Immigration: What do we know and what to expect?

General

Mar 14

This article is a subjective analysis and prediction of the potential immigration policies under Canada’s new Minister of Immigration, Rachel Bendayan.

A New Era in Canadian Immigration?

Today, Canada’s newly elected Prime Minister, Mark Carney, unveiled his first cabinet, signaling a sharp departure from the Trudeau era by reducing the number of ministers by half. One of the most critical appointments is Rachel Bendayan as the new Minister of Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship. With immigration at the center of national debates on housing, labor shortages, and economic sustainability, Bendayan’s leadership is poised to shape Canada’s future significantly.

But will her appointment mark a new direction, or will she continue the trajectory established under her predecessor, Marc Miller?

Mark Carney’s Stance on Immigration

Prime Minister Mark Carney has expressed a clear stance on immigration, openly criticizing the approach taken by the previous Liberal government under Justin Trudeau. He has highlighted Canada’s limited capacity to accommodate the surge in newcomers, stating:

“We had much higher levels of foreign workers, students, and new Canadians coming in than we could absorb.”

His concerns center on the strain placed on housing, healthcare, and public services. To address this, Carney advocates for a temporary immigration cap, aiming to return immigration levels to what he describes as "sustainable pre-pandemic trendlines."

However, despite his criticism of past policies, Carney’s approach largely aligns with the recent direction set by Trudeau’s government. Former Immigration Minister Marc Miller had already introduced substantial cuts to immigration numbers and imposed restrictions on various temporary and permanent residence programs. This suggests that under Carney’s administration, the trend of reducing new admissions and tightening program eligibility will likely continue.

While Carney has emphasized a more targeted, economically driven immigration model, aligning immigration with labor market needs and infrastructure capacity, it remains uncertain whether his administration, alongside Minister Rachel Bendayan, will introduce fundamentally new policies or simply maintain the restrictive trajectory already established.

Why Rachel Bendayan?

Rachel Bendayan’s appointment signals Carney’s preference for a structured, economically aligned immigration policy. Her background in law, commerce, and international trade suggests a pragmatic, evidence-based approach to managing immigration. Rather than making drastic policy shifts, she is expected to refine existing strategies to balance economic needs with infrastructure constraints.

Born on May 10, 1980, in Montreal to a Moroccan-Jewish family, Rachel Bendayan earned her law degree from McGill University in 2007. She built a successful legal career at Norton Rose Fulbright, specializing in commercial litigation and international arbitration. Her academic role at Université de Montréal’s Faculty of Law underscores her analytical approach, emphasizing evidence-based policymaking.

Bendayan entered politics in 2015, contesting the federal election in Outremont but narrowly losing to NDP leader Thomas Mulcair. However, in a 2019 by-election, she won the seat and has since maintained strong voter support. Her parliamentary experience includes serving as Parliamentary Secretary for Finance, Small Business, and International Trade, as well as Minister of Official Languages and Associate Minister of Public Safety.

She has also been actively engaged in international affairs through her participation in several key parliamentary associations, strengthening Canada’s diplomatic ties and legislative collaboration with global partners. As a member of the Canada-Europe Parliamentary Association (CAEU) and the Canada-France Inter-Parliamentary Association (CAFR), she has contributed to fostering bilateral relations and policy exchanges between Canada and European nations. Her involvement in the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association (CANA) underscores her commitment to international security and defense cooperation, while her work with the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group (CEUS) has helped reinforce the close political and economic relationship between the two neighboring countries. Additionally, as part of the Canadian Delegation to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Parliamentary Assembly (SECO), she has engaged in multilateral discussions on security, democracy, and human rights, furthering Canada’s role in global governance and stability.

Political Insights and Leadership Style

Bendayan’s political record suggests she will continue the recent downward trajectory in immigration numbers. Given Carney’s emphasis on aligning immigration with Canada’s economic capacities—particularly concerning housing, healthcare, and labor market absorption—Bendayan will likely adhere closely to these priorities, reinforcing rather than reversing the current restrictive approach.

Her cautious, evidence-based decision-making style further supports this expectation. Instead of implementing radical changes, Bendayan is expected to carefully calibrate immigration targets based on measurable economic indicators. This aligns with the broader governmental commitment to sustainable immigration, making significant increases in immigration levels under her leadership unlikely.

Projecting Bendayan’s Immigration Policy Direction

Given Bendayan’s political background and Carney’s immigration priorities, radical departures from recent immigration policies are improbable. Instead, expect nuanced, economically driven refinements that prioritize skilled workers in key industries such as trades, technology, and healthcare. Her experience in international trade suggests she may also focus on business immigration pathways that align with Canada’s economic growth strategies.

Unlike her predecessor Marc Miller, whose policies often appeared reactive to immediate socio-economic pressures, Bendayan is likely to take a more proactive, strategic approach. This could mean increased emphasis on regional immigration programs, labor market-matched admissions, and systematic assessments of infrastructure capacity before setting immigration targets.

Carney and Bendayan: What Will Change in Immigration Policy?

Prime Minister Carney has consistently criticized past immigration policies for exceeding Canada’s economic and infrastructural capacities. Under Trudeau, Canada saw historic highs in immigration, culminating in a 20% reduction in immigration targets under Marc Miller’s leadership. Carney’s appointment of Rachel Bendayan, with her background in economics and trade rather than immigration-specific policy, indicates a strategic focus on executing these restrictions rather than introducing drastic ideological shifts.

Given her legislative history, Bendayan is unlikely to challenge the government's economic rationale for lowering immigration numbers. Instead, she is expected to further entrench a cautious, measured immigration approach.

Will Structural Reforms Happen?

The key question is whether Bendayan will introduce significant structural reforms to how immigration targets are set. There is a possibility that her administration will refine economic immigration streams, linking admission numbers more closely to labor market demands, housing availability, and regional distribution. However, dramatic policy shifts remain unlikely.

Rather than a radical transformation, Bendayan’s appointment suggests continuity: immigration numbers will likely remain on a downward trend, but with more structured, data-driven policy execution. Unlike the politically reactive stance seen under Trudeau and Miller, the Carney-Bendayan approach is expected to be more economically focused and strategic, potentially leading to further immigration reductions if economic conditions warrant.

Conclusion

Rachel Bendayan’s appointment signals an immigration policy firmly rooted in Carney’s economic vision. She is expected to oversee a cautious, deliberate immigration strategy aligned with Canada’s economic realities, continuing the downward trend in immigration levels established by the previous administration. Whether this economically focused approach will adequately balance Canada’s long-term demographic and humanitarian commitments remains to be seen and will ultimately define Bendayan’s tenure.

Featured