What to Do If Your Immigration Application to Canada Was Refused: Your Top 3 Options Explained

If your immigration application to Canada has been refused, you might be feeling frustrated and confused, especially if the refusal letter was vague. This blog post will help you navigate through the three main options available to challenge a refusal: Reapply, Submit a Reconsideration Request, or Challenge the Refusal in Federal Court.

 
 

Option 1: Reapply (submit new application)

Reapplying is often the most straightforward and cost-effective option. If your application was refused due to issues like insufficient funds or lack of ties to your home country, you can address these concerns in a new application. For instance, you can reapply with additional evidence of your financial stability or provide more documentation showing why you will return back from Canada before the end of your authorized stay (for example, you can provide evidence of ownership of real or personal property, proof of stable employment, or explain your family commitments and other ties to your home country).

The first step in reapplying is to carefully review the refusal letter to understand the specific reasons for the refusal. Common reasons would typically include insufficient financial proof, lack of ties to your home country, incomplete documentation, or failure to meet specific program requirements. Sometimes, you can get a generic idea as to why your application was refused by reading the refusal letter. But, in cases where the refusal letter is vague, obtaining GCMS (Global Case Management System) notes can be invaluable. These notes provide a detailed log of all activities on your file and offer a more thorough explanation of the reasoning of the officer that led to a refusal.

Once you have a clear understanding of why your application was refused, you can address these issues in your new application. This might involve gathering additional documentation, providing clearer explanations, or correcting any errors from your previous submission. Consulting with an immigration lawyer can provide valuable guidance in this process. Your lawyer can help you understand the reasons for the refusal, gather the necessary documentation, and ensure your new application is as strong as possible.

Reapplying can be a quick and cost-effective way to address the issues identified in your initial application and improve your chances of approval. However, it's important to note that if the underlying issues are not adequately addressed, the new application may be refused again.

Advantages of Reapplying

Simplicity: Reapplying can be a straightforward process if you know the reasons for refusal and can address them effectively.

Cost-Effective: Compared to other options, reapplying is relatively inexpensive.

Timely: A new application can often be processed quicker than other methods of challenging a refusal.

DISAdvantages of Reapplying

Unclear Refusal Reasons: If the refusal letter is vague, it might be challenging to address the concerns without additional information.

Repeated Refusal Risk: If the underlying issues are not adequately addressed, the new application may be refused again.

Option 2: Submit a Reconsideration Request

A reconsideration request is a formal letter to the immigration officer asking them to reopen and reassess your refused application. This option is free and can be effective if there was a clear mistake in the refusal. Essentially, you identify any errors or oversights in the officer’s assessment of your application, such as misinterpretation of your documents, incorrect application of the law, or failure to consider all the information provided.

Writing a reconsideration request involves drafting a clear and concise letter explaining the error and providing evidence to support your claim. The letter should be respectful and professional, with well-organized arguments. This request is then sent through the IRCC webform along with all relevant documents that support your case.

While reconsideration requests can be successful, they are subject to the officer’s discretion and can take weeks to be reviewed. Additionally, IRCC (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada) may not even respond to your request, leaving you in a prolonged state of uncertainty. Despite these potential drawbacks, submitting a reconsideration request can be a straightforward and cost-free way to address the refusal of your initial application and potentially get your case reopened without the need for submitting a new application.

Advantages of a Reconsideration Request

Cost-Free: There is no fee to submit a reconsideration request.

Simple Process: It involves writing and submitting a letter, which can be quicker than other methods.

Potential for Quick Resolution: If the officer acknowledges the error, your application could be reopened and approved without further delay.

Disadvantages of a Reconsideration Request

Discretionary Nature: The officer is not obligated to consider or act on your request.

Time-Consuming: It can take weeks or even months for your request to be reviewed.

Uncertain Outcome: There is no guarantee that your request will be successful or that you will receive a response.

Option 3: Challenge the Refusal in Federal Court

Challenging a refusal in Federal Court, also known as filing for an Application for Leave and Judicial Review (ALJR) , is the most complex, time-consuming, and expensive option. However, it can be the most logical approach in certain situations. The ALJR process involves two stages: filing a Leave Application and preparing the Application Record, and if Leave is granted attending the hearing at the Federal Court.

Judicial reviews have strict deadlines. You have 15 days to file a Leave Application if your matter arises from inside Canada, and 60 days for outside Canada applications. Missing these deadlines can forfeit your chance for a judicial review. Consulting with an immigration lawyer as soon as you get a refusal is absolutely crucial for navigating this complex process. An immigration lawyer can help you build a case, prepare the necessary documents, and represent you in court.

The first step in this Judicial Review process is to file a formal Leave Application to the Federal Court. Once filed, you must wait for the “Rule 9” reasons, an excerpt with the notes made by the immigration officer, which can take about 1 to 2 months. After receiving the Rule 9 reasons, you have 30 days to prepare and submit the Application Record. The Application Record is a comprehensive document that includes the affidavit with exhibits, as well as a detailed memorandum outlining the facts, law and legal arguments explaining why your application should be allowed. Following the submission of the Application Record, the respondent (IRCC) also has 30 days to prepare and submit their memorandum. This brings the timeline to approximately four months from the initial refusal.

The court will then decide whether to grant “Leave” (think of it as an “acceptance” or “permission”) to proceed.

If Leave is granted, you will proceed to the second stage, where you will have a hearing before a judge. It can take another month or so to schedule the hearing. The judge will decide whether to order the application to be reopened and reconsidered by a different officer. If successful, you return to the beginning, waiting for the officer to reconsider your file. However, you can ask the judge to allow additional supporting documents, potentially strengthening your case.

An ideal scenario during a judicial review is reaching a settlement with IRCC, where the Respondent (IRCC) agrees to reopen your application and have it reviewed by a different immigration officer. This can save time, resources, and costs for both parties. Settlements can occur early in the process or later, depending on the case specifics.

Advantages of JUDICIAL REVIEW

Legal Recourse: It provides a formal legal avenue to challenge the refusal.

Detailed Examination: The court thoroughly examines the case, ensuring that all aspects are considered and that the decision of the immigration officer was reasonable, intelligible, and transparent.

Potential for Reopening the Case: If successful, the court can order the application to be reconsidered by a different officer.

Disadvantages of JUDICIAL REVIEW

Complex and Lengthy: The process can take several months to over a year.

Expensive: Legal fees and court costs can be significant.

No Guarantee of Approval: Even if the court orders the application to be reopened, there is no guarantee that the new officer will approve it.

Conclusion

If your immigration application to Canada has been refused, you have three primary options: reapply, submit a reconsideration request, or challenge the refusal in Federal Court. Each option has its advantages and disadvantages, and the best choice depends on your specific situation. Acting quickly and strategically is essential. Seeking professional help as soon as possible can provide the best chance of overturning a refusal. If you need assistance, book a consultation with us to discuss your unique situation and determine the best course of action.

 

Continue Reading

About the author:

Igor Kyryliuk

Canadian Immigration Lawyer, LLM

Previous
Previous

Eligibility for the SOWP for Spouses and Common-Law Partners of International Students: What Does the Future Hold?

Next
Next

Reopened Alberta Opportunity Stream: A Pathway to Success or a Recipe for Disaster?